The Liberal Cloak: The Constant-De Pradt Controversy on Bolívar’s Last Dictatorship

Authors

  • José Antonio Aguilar Rivera Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15460/jbla.55.67

Keywords:

Emergency Powers, Dictatorship, Liberalism, Constitutions, Polemic

Abstract

This paper examines the 1830 polemic between Benjamin Constant and the Abbé de Pradt over Simón Bolívar’s last dictatorship. I argue that in the debate a key flaw of liberal constitutionalism was evidenced: the lack of a theory of emergency powers. The new nations of Latin America drafted constitutions following Constant’s ideas regarding emergency provisions. Constant had argued forcibly against broad emergency provisions. While Bolívar was an admirer of Constant, he deviated from his constitutional thinking regarding temporary emergency provisions.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-11

Issue

Section

Constitutionalism in Latin America (Section organized by José M. Portillo)

URN

How to Cite

The Liberal Cloak: The Constant-De Pradt Controversy on Bolívar’s Last Dictatorship. (2018). Anuario De Historia De América Latina, 55, 84-107. https://doi.org/10.15460/jbla.55.67